[haw-info] Iran War Weekly - March 25, 2013
Historians  Against the War is posting Frank Brodhead's "Iran War Weekly,' as a helpful  resource for our members and friends. Frank earned a PhD in history at Princeton University  and has co-authored several books on US foreign policy. He is a scholar  and political activist who has worked with peace and social justice movements  for many years. In 2010-2011 he produced the "Afghanistan War Weekly," which was  widely used by antiwar groups across the country.
        Iran War Weekly
        March 25, 2013
        Hello All – Last week's "technical  talks" between Iran and the P5+1 (the five permanent members of the UN Security  Council plus Germany) deflated the hopes generated by the meeting of "higher  level" negotiators in Kazakhstan in February, suggesting that little can be  expected by the next round of talks scheduled, again in Kazakhstan, on April 5  and 6. 
        The technical talks revealed that  the parties remained miles apart on the fundamental principles of an  agreement.  In fact, as the Leveretts  suggest in their article linked below, things are about where they were a year  ago.  The US-led team demands that Iran take major steps toward ending its  nuclear-enrichment activities before it will consider a significant lifting of  economic sanctions, a position that Iran continues to reject.  With Iran's presidential elections  coming in June, little can now be expected from the next round of negotiations  in April.
        Gridlock in the nuclear negotiations  makes this week's developments in Syria especially ominous.  Major reports in The New York Times and The  Wall St. Journal have revealed the greatly increased tempo of arms  shipments to Syria's  opposition, and the growing role of the CIA in managing this.  Presumably this represents a decision by the  Obama administration to double-down on its commitment to the "non-Islamist"  armed opposition.  The collapse of the  external, political wing of this opposition this week, described in a number of  articles linked below, thus leaves the United   States with only a military strategy for Syria.
        And the reach of the war in Syria continues  to widen.  This week Secretary of State  Kerry made a visit to Iraq  to demand that Iraq cease  allowing Iranian overflights to Syria.  US military personnel stepped up their role  in Jordan, purportedly to  prepare for seizing Syria's  chemical weapons.  Israel "returned fire" (of unknown origin) into Syria.  Lebanon's  coalition government collapsed, reported a casualty of internal political  divisions related to the war in Syria.  The possibility of a truly regional war – and  one that would involve the United States  and Iran  – seems very high.
        Frank Brodhead
        OVERVIEWS AND PERSPECTIVES
        Playing Chicken with the Islamic Republic 
        ---- Threats of attack and sanctions  have proven to be a double-edged sword, inflicting real damage on both the  Iranian regime and its democratic opposition, with real costs for the fragile  European economy and America's  strategic power. Despite the Iranian regime's defiant bravado, the Islamic  Republic is under extraordinary pressure. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei faces  unprecedented discord within his own circles, multiple challenges to Iran's  strategic regional influence, the threat of attack and the noose of draconian  sanctions. But the story has another side: threats and sanctions have had  benefits as well as costs for the regime and are exacerbating strategic  problems for the West. The change of tone emanating from both Washington  and Tehran  indicates both sides see advantages to meaningful negotiations. http://www.opendemocracy.net/opensecurity/linda-heiden/playing-chicken-with-islamic-republic
        Obama's Choice: Real Diplomacy (or War) with Iran 
        By Hillary Mann Leverett and Flynt  Leverett. Aljazeera [March 23, 2013]
        ---- Contrary to conventional  wishful thinking in American policy circles, developments in the nuclear talks  between Iran and the P5+1 and the Iran-related messages coming out of President  Obama's trip to Israel strongly suggest that the risk of a US-initiated  military confrontation with Tehran during Obama's second term are rising, not  falling. This is because Obama's administration has made an ill-considered  wager that it can "diplomatically" coerce Iran's abandonment of indigenous  nuclear fuel cycle capabilities. This is dangerous, for it will become clear  over the next year or so - the timeframe Obama himself has set before he would  consider Iran  able to build nuclear weapons - that the bet has failed. If the administration  does not change course and accept Iran's  strategic independence and rising regional influence - including accepting the  principle and reality of internationally-safeguarded uranium enrichment in Iran, it will eventually be left with no  fallback from which to resist pressure from Israel  and its friends in Washington  for military strikes, at least against Iranian nuclear facilities. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/03/2013323122320841464.html
        Strategic Engagement: Iran,  Iraq  and the Gulf Cooperation Council
        By Seyed Hossein Mousavian March 23,  2013
        ---- Although the mistrust is deeply  rooted on both sides, Iran, Iraq and the GCC share a number of interests and  concerns, including avoiding a fourth war in the region, fighting drug  trafficking and organised crime, combating terrorism and extremism, preventing  a clash of civilisations which can lead to a significantly greater degree of  animosity among the West and the Muslim nations; safe maritime passage of oil  shipments through the narrow Strait of Hormuz and security for a quarter of the  world's international energy exports, promoting the role of the Muslim world in  the international arena; and last but not least, managing crises in Muslim  countries. The question is whether the current tensions can be defused and  efforts made to focus on areas of mutual interest and build a new relationship  between Iran  and the GCC. My diplomatic experience suggests it is a possibility and  necessity. http://gulfnews.com/opinions/columnists/strategic-engagement-iran-iraq-and-the-gcc-1.1161822
        NEGOTIATIONS ON IRAN'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM
        Nuclear talks: Iran  unmoved by world powers' latest proposal 
        By Scott Peterson, Christian Science Monitor [March 19,  2013]
        ---- Behind closed doors in Istanbul yesterday, six world powers gave Iran more details on their latest proposal to  limit Iran's most sensitive  nuclear work – an offer Iran  says still has "no balance" because it asks Iran to give up more than it gets  in return. In marathon 13.5-hour talks, the world powers clarified demands made  last month that Iran limit uranium enrichment to 20 percent – a level  not too far technically from bomb-grade – and put its Fordow underground  facility out of service, in exchange for modest relief from sanctions that have  crippled Iran's economy. Iran  said that the incentives were not strong enough, and that  the outcome of a year-long negotiation was still too ambiguous to  take initial steps that could overcome mutual mistrust. That result  tempers optimism voiced by Iran  in late February that changes in the six world powers' offer were a potential  "turning point." http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2013/0319/Nuclear-talks-Iran-unmoved-by-world-powers-latest-proposal?nav=87-frontpage-entryNineItem
        The Not-So-Imminent Iranian Nuke: A Year Away for a Decade 
        By Nima Shirazi, Wide Asleep in America [March 18, 2013]
        ---- According to official  estimates, the Islamic Republic of Iran is now roughly a year away from  acquiring a nuclear bomb.  Well, that is, if it were actually building a  nuclear bomb.  Which it's not.  "Right now, we think it would  take over a year or so for Iran  to actually develop a nuclear weapon, but obviously we don't want to cut it too  close," President Barack Obama told an Israeli television station on March  14, 2013.  Obama's statement came just two days after his own Director of  National Intelligence told a Senate committee that the Iranian government had  not made a decision to weaponize its legal, safeguarded civilian nuclear energy  program. …Repeating his administration's main talking point, Obama told  his Israeli interviewer, "What I have also said is that there is a window,  not an infinite period of time, but a window of time where we can resolve this  diplomatically and it is in all of our interests." But this window has  already been open for decades and Iran has supposedly been only a  year away from a bomb for the past ten years. http://www.wideasleepinamerica.com/2013/03/the-not-so-imminent-iranian-nuke-year-away.html
        Iran Open to Direct US  Talks
        By Jason Ditz, Antiwar.com [March 21, 2013]
        ---- Iranian Supreme Leader Grand  Ayatollah Ali Khamenei says that his nation is not opposed to holding direct  talks with the United States  about its nuclear program, the first time he suggested such talks were a  possibility. The last time he commented on talks, he downplayed the reports of  "progress" in nuclear talks, insisting that he doubted Western nations were  really open to making substantial concessions. In today's comments he remained  skeptical, saying he doubts that bilateral talks with the US would yield any results so long  as the administration keeps adding sanctions. Khamenei says that there have  been US messages delivered  to Iran in the past about  such talks, but that the messages suggested they only wanted to demand Iran give in to all US demands, adding "this is not  dialogue." He also said he is concerned the US wants to just leave the issue  unresolved so they can keep adding sanctions. http://news.antiwar.com/2013/03/21/iran-open-to-direct-us-talks/
        US ISSUES AND VIEWS
        US Persian Gulf Policy in Obama's  Second Term
        By Gary  Sick [March 24, 2013]
        ---- There are powerful voices in the United   States pushing Obama in the direction of direct U.S. military action in the Middle   East. Specifically, there are calls for more active intervention  in Syria and in favor of  explicit threats of military action against Iran. In Syria, the rationale begins with the  horrors of the humanitarian disaster, as the Alawite government of Bashar  al-Assad fights, literally, for its life. A second reason put forward by  proponents of a more muscular policy is to neutralize Iran's role in the Levant and counteract its  direct assistance to Damascus.  A third reason, which goes to the very heart of America's policy dilemma in the  21st century, is that the United States, according to these voices,  is still the indispensable nation and should not be satisfied to "lead from  behind." With regard to Iran,  the reasoning is somewhat different. Despite the most stifling precautionary  economic sanctions ever imposed against a member state of the United Nations, Iran  continues to pursue its nuclear development program. The sanctions, it is argued  by some, must be reinforced with clear promises of military action if Iran  fails to comply with the demands of the United Nations Security Council. In both  cases, a more aggressive U.S.  posture carries real risks that minor skirmishes or even accidents could  escalate quickly into a full blown war. http://garysick.tumblr.com/post/45787800398/us-persian-gulf-policy-in-obamas-second-term
        IRANIAN ISSUES AND VIEWS
        Why the Revolutionary Guards Do Not Run Iran's Economy
        By Kevan Harris, The Diplomat [March 21, 2013]
        ---- There has long been a consensus  among Western pundits that the IRGC controls Iran's economy. The truth is much  messier. Particularly in the wake of the contested 2009 presidential elections  in the Islamic Republic, a popular consensus has taken shape among Western  government officials, policymakers, and scholars on the immense role the  Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) plays in the Iranian economy. Today,  this position significantly informs sanctions policy, as individuals,  businesses, and organizations suspected of having ties to current or former  IRGC members are quickly blacklisted by Washington  and Brussels  from international finance and trade networks. My research details how,  since 2006, Iran's government has sold off huge blocks of public companies'  shares through the stock market, transfers to cooperative holding companies, or  simply handing over ownership to semi-public bodies to which the government is  indebted. The creation of cooperatives, firms, and investment  conglomerates affiliated with the IRGC and parastatal bodies do not signify a  creeping militarization or "revolutionary" ideological subordination of Iran's  economy so much as they characterize the commodification of bureaucratic  privilege and status held by individuals in these organizations. http://thediplomat.com/2013/03/21/why-the-revolutionary-guards-do-not-run-irans-economy/
        The Tragic Endings of Iranian Cinema
        By Hamid  Dabashi, Aljazeera [March 23, 2013]
        ---- The ruling regime in Iran  has succeeded in ripping the leading Iranian filmmakers from the fabric of  their society and cast them into vague and ambiguous environments about which  they know very little. Given their creative ingenuity - as now perhaps best  evident in the works of Jafar Panahi or Mohsen Makhmalbaf - they can manage to  create almost anywhere, from their living room to the occupied Palestine, but the result  begins to abstract the filmmakers from that certain intuition of transcendence  that approximates an artist to the sacred precincts of her and his  culture. … This is not to say Iranian cinema has no future - but that  future is being mapped out and navigated on unchartered territories far from  major European or even non-European film festivals. Under the radar is now a  young generation of filmmakers whose courageous and imaginative works are yet  to receive any recognition in their own homeland or celebration in any major  film festival. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/03/2013320175739100357.html
        ISRAELI ISSUES AND VIEWS
        Turkey: Israel Normalization Would Require Ending Gaza Blockade
        By Jason Ditz, Antiwar.com [March 24, 2013]
        ---- Friday's belated Israeli  apology for killing nine aid workers aboard the Turkish aid ship Mavi Marmara  was being spun as the ticket to normalization of relations between Israel and Turkey,  and Israeli officials have suggested they considered this a goal, with an eye  on Syria.  Yet the indications are that it isn't so simple, with comments from both sides  suggesting that the status of the Gaza Strip is going to continue to strain the  relationship of the two nations going forward. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip  Erdogan suggested that the full normalization of  relations with Israel would require not only compensation for victims of the  Mavi Marmara attack, but a commitment to continue easing the blockade of the  Gaza Strip, something Israel promised already after the November war. That  seems unlikely, as Israeli officials not only insisted that there was no  commitment to any further relaxation of the Gaza blockade, adding that there was  a possibility of a further crackdown on the strip. That already seems to be  happening, with Israel  severely restricting fishing over the past few days. As for compensation,  Israeli officials say they will support a deal if Turkey promises not to prosecute  any Israeli soldiers for the killings. http://news.antiwar.com/2013/03/24/turkey-israel-normalization-would-require-ending-gaza-blockade/
        Weapons Experts Raise Doubts About Israel's Antimissile System
        By William J. Broad, New York Times [March 20, 2013]
        ---- For Iron Dome, the performance  issue is important, in part, because defense bears strongly on offense. Israel's decision on whether to bomb Iran's nuclear sites — as it has repeatedly  threatened to do — could hinge on its estimate of the retaliatory costs,  including damage inflicted by rockets fired from southern Lebanon and the Gaza Strip. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/21/world/middleeast/israels-iron-dome-system-is-at-center-of-debate.html?ref=world
        CIVIL WAR/INTERVENTION IN SYRIA
        Islamic Front and Nusra Move on Damascus.  Will the US  build a Counter-force? 
        From Syria Comment [March 24, 2013]
        ---- The Islam Front and Jabhat  al-Nusra are gaining strength. Already al-Nusra has a strong foothold in the Damascus region in the Palestinian neighborhood of Yarmouk,  around the Jabal Druze, and in the Daraya-Adhamiya region of Damascus. The US and British are trying to  build up forces around Damascus  as well, in order to take the capital. They are working hand in glove with  Saudis and particularly the Jordanians. Hence the many stories about US training missions in Jordan and cooperation with  Jordanian intelligence. Some believe that the US, British and French may  be developing a strategy to spearhead a move on Damascus before the Islamic  Front and al-Nusra can capture it for themselves. But it is not clear how  committed the US  and the West are to manning up the opposition in the South of Syria to gain the  jump on the growing Islamic tide washing down from the North. http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/?p=18297
        The Case for Restraint: Syria  and the International Criminal Court
        By Betcy  Jose,Aljazeera [March 21, 2013]
        ---- The violence and bloodshed from  all sides continues, and the international community remains stalemated as to  its response to the ongoing crisis. It has explored a number of options, from  diplomacy to more coercive action like economic sanctions and military force.  Recently, there have been calls for judicial intervention by the International  Criminal Court (ICC). Is this a viable option? This piece examines the  effectiveness of an ICC investigation as a means of halting the Syrian  conflict. It first discusses non-judicial options currently on the table. By  illustrating how difficult these options are, a case can be made for why  pursuing the judicial option right now may not be effective in helping Syrian  civilians or sustaining international law. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/03/2013320164619306786.html
        Additional perspectives – Line Zouhour, "Whither the Peaceful Movement in Syria?"  Jadaliyya [March 18,  2013] http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/10616/whither-the-peaceful-movement-in-syria#.UUiS_T6uH0w.facebook;  Stephen M. Walt, "The Dearth of Strategy on Syria," Foreign Policy [March 21, 2013] http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/03/21/the_dearth_of_strategy_on_syria;  and Bassam Haddad, "Perpetual Recalculation: Getting Syria Wrong Two Years On,"  March 18, 2013] http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/10674/perpetual-recalculation_getting-syria-wrong-two-ye
        US Steps Up Military Assistance to Opposition
        Obama Boosts Syria  Support as Congress Pushes Military Intervention
        By Samer Araabi, Inter Press Service [March 23, 2013]
        ---- As the Syrian uprising enters  its third year, the United States  and its allies are preparing to materially increase their support of the armed  opposition in Syria. Secretary of State John Kerry pledged an additional 60  million dollars in direct aid to the rebels, marking the first time Washington will directly  supply rebel forces, but the administration appears as wary as ever to get more  directly involved.
        The provision of battlefield  materiel has been met with some support from hawks who have pushed for greater  military intervention, though many policymakers have urged the president to go  even further. Exhortations for intervention have increased since rumours began  of a chemical weapons attack in Aleppo.  Though U.S. officials have  largely dismissed the reports, many members of Congress expressed concern about  the use of weapons of mass destruction in Syria. http://www.ipsnews.net/2013/03/obama-boosts-syria-support-as-congress-pushes-for-military-intervention/
        Arms Airlift to Syria  Rebels Expands, With C.I.A. Aid
        By C. J. Chivers and Eric Schmitt, New York Times [March 24, 2013]
        ---- With help from the C.I.A., Arab  governments and Turkey have  sharply increased their military aid to Syria's opposition fighters in  recent months, expanding a secret airlift of arms and equipment for the  uprising against PresidentBashar al-Assad, according to air traffic data,  interviews with officials in several countries and the accounts of rebel  commanders. The airlift, which began on a small scale in early 2012 and  continued intermittently through last fall, expanded into a steady and much  heavier flow late last year, the data shows. The shipments also highlight the  competition for Syria's  future between Sunni Muslim states and Iran, the Shiite theocracy that  remains Mr. Assad's main ally. Secretary of State John Kerry pressed Iraq on Sunday to do more to halt Iranian arms  shipments through its airspace; he did so even as the most recent military  cargo flight from Qatar  for the rebels landed at Esenboga early Sunday night. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/world/middleeast/arms-airlift-to-syrian-rebels-expands-with-cia-aid.html?hp
        More on the CIA – Adam Entous et al., "CIA Expands Role in Syria Fight," Wall  St. Journal [March 22, 2013] http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324373204578376591874909434.html
        Syrian Opposition in Chaos
        Syrian Opposition in Disarray as its  Leader Resigns
        By Liz Sly, Washington Post [March 24, 2013]
        ---- Syria's opposition coalition was on  the verge of collapse Sunday after its president resigned and rebel fighters  rejected its choice to head an interim government, leaving a U.S.-backed effort  to forge a united front against President Bashar al-Assad in tatters. The  resignation of Moaz al-Khatib, a moderate Sunni preacher who heads the Syrian  Opposition Coalition, climaxed a bitter internal fight over a range of issues,  from the appointment of an interim government to a proposal by Khatib to launch  negotiations with the Syrian regime. His departure plunged the opposition into  disarray at a time when the United    States and its Western allies are stepping  up their support for moderates opposed to Assad's regime. Khatib's coalition  was expected to play a key role in identifying the recipients and channeling  the assistance. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/syrian-opposition-in-disarray-as-its-leader-resigns/2013/03/24/16523304-94ba-11e2-95ca-dd43e7ffee9c_story.html
        More on the state of the opposition – Jason Ditz, "Syrian Rebel  Coalition Crumbling: President Resigns," Antiwar.com  [March 24, 2013] http://news.antiwar.com/2013/03/24/syrian-rebel-coalition-crumbling-president-resigns/;  Joshua Landis, "Who is Ghassn Hitto? Why Was He backed to be Prime Minister of  an Interim Gov by Mustafa Sabbagh?" Syria Comment [March 19, 2013] http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/?p=18160;  Franklin Lamb, "Could the White House Have Dreamt for More?" Counterpunch [March 22, 2013] http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/22/a-draft-dodging-zionist-friendly-rghtwing-texan-islamist-to-lead-syria/;  and Anne Barnard and Hala Droubi, "Syrian Opposition Leader Quits Post," New York Times [March 24, 2013] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/world/middleeast/israeli-military-responds-after-patrols-come-under-fire-from-syria.html?hp
        The Chemical Weapon That Wasn't
        Syria 'Chemical' Attack Was Rebels' Doing, Evidence Suggests
        By Jason Ditz, Antiwar.com [March 24, 2013]
        ---- Last week's report of a  chemical weapon attack in Syria's Aleppo Province sparked an array of calls to  action, with most nations and politicians insisting it vindicated whatever  position they had before, despite many points of uncertainty about it. The  incident is coming into sharper focus now, however. The attack, intelligence  sources appear to agree, was launched by rebel fighters and not government  forces. Since the victims were overwhelmingly the Syrian military, this was not  a huge shock, but is important to reiterate. The other interesting aspect is  that it was not a "proper" chemical weapon, at least from preliminary  investigations. The evidence suggests that the strike used a lachrymatory  agent, not a nerve agent, and that the deaths were caused by suffocating on  chlorine-based gas that was injected into a warhead. In some ways, this is a  distinction without a difference, as the use of suffocating gas, regardless of  how it kills people, is a serious war crime under international law. The  important factor, however, is that it is not the sort of weapon Syria  has in its arsenal, rather it is a lower-tech solution. 
                More on US  policy re: chemical weapons – Mark Landler and Rick Gladstone, "Chemicals Would Be 'Game Changer'  in Syria,  Obama Says," New York Times [March  20, 2013] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/21/world/middleeast/syria-developments.html?ref=world;  and Greg Miller, et al., "Backing up Obama's Warnings  to Syria Creates Tough Challenges on Two Fronts,"  Washington Post [March 24, 2013] http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/backing-up-obamas-warnings-to-syria-creates-tough-challenges-on-two-fronts/2013/03/24/95cd5570-9314-11e2-a31e-14700e2724e4_story.html
        Syria's Conflict Engulfs the Neighborhood
        In 'Spirited' Talks, Kerry Tells Iraq  to Help Stop Arms Shipments to Syria
        By Michael R. Gordon and Tim Arango, New York Times [March 24, 2013]
        ---- Secretary of State John Kerry  told Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, the prime minister of Iraq,  on Sunday that Iraq must take steps to stop Iran  from shipping arms to Syria  through Iraqi airspace. But an hour and 40 minutes of discussions here, which  Mr. Kerry said were sometimes "spirited," failed to yield a breakthrough on the  issue. As Mr. Kerry prepared to leave Iraq  afterward, he warned that the Iranian flights were sustaining the government of  the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, and were undermining Iraq's standing with American  lawmakers. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/world/middleeast/baghdad-kerry-iraq-arms-shipments-to-syria.html?ref=world
        Also on US-Iraq-Iran – Jason Ditz, "Maliki Rejects Kerry Demand to Bar Iran  Overflights," Antiwar.com [March 24,  2013] http://news.antiwar.com/2013/03/24/maliki-rejects-kerry-demand-to-bar-iran-overflights/.
        Mikati's Resignation Throws Lebanon into Deeper Crisis
        Associated Press [March 24, 2013]
        ---- Lebanese President Michel  Suleiman formally accepted yesterday the resignation of the prime minister, who  stepped down blaming government infighting during a time of rising sectarian  tensions. Mr Mikati's unexpected resignation throws the country into  uncertainty at a crucial time and threatens to leave a void in the state's  highest ranks amid sporadic violence inflamed by the civil war in Syria.  Underpinning the political crisis are Lebanon's  hugely sectarian politics and the fact that the country's two largest political  blocs support opposite sides in Syria's  civil war. Lebanon and Syria share a complex network of political and  sectarian ties, and many fear that violence in Syria  will spread to Lebanon.  Some Lebanese media have speculated that his decision to step down was based on  "insinuations" from the US and its allies to clear the way  for an anti-Hizbollah majority, or at least a neutral government. http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle-east/mikatis-resignation-throws-lebanon-into-deeper-crisis
        
